Tuesday, May 16, 2006

NO MAN LANDED ON THE MOON


There was a serious argument between the Advocates of Hoax and National Aeronantics and Space Administration (NASA) about moon landing. The entire drone about the Moon began on 15th of February 2001. When Fox television aired the program entitled Conspiracy Theory: Did We Land on the Moon? The Advocates totally disagree with evidence that were given by NASA. Advocates identified different things from the evidence of Astronauts that lead them to the conclusion that Landing on the Moon were a hoax.


The most prominent advocates of the hoax theory were Bill Kaysing, Ralph Rene, David Percy, Marry Bennett and more recently Bart Sibrel. Bill Kaysing argued that landing on the moon was faked in the Nevada desert (http://www.badastronomm.com/bad/mis

Ralph Rene believed that the NASA decided not to land to the moon and fake it. Data showed was accurate but there was a big difference between a “defect” and “major technical problem”. As results moon landing was failed. In contrary, the studies conducted by Apollo Support Department of the General Electric Company in Florida showed that the chances of landing on the moon and returning safely to the earth were very high. It was more than 90%. The assessment was based on the understanding and technology of that time. (http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm)


Furthermore, Bill as one of the Advocates argues that NASA has perpetrated in lie that there was no stars can be observed in a space to validate lack of stars. In all photo graph, there were no stars were visible but NASA said that the purpose of the photos was to record the activities on the surface of the moon not to take the stars.

All the pictures taken by the astronauts, the shadows were not black. Object in the shadow were clearly, including a plague on the side of the lander that can read easily. If the sun is the only source of light on the mob, the Hoax Believers (HBs) say, and there is no air to scatter the light, shadow should be utterly http://www.badastronomm.com/bad/mis

The man who designed the camera of astronauts was contacted to know more information about the pictures. The pictures were perfect. They could not take perfect picture every time. The man did not give the answer. He hemmed and hammed. The situation was difficult for him to speak the truth during the interview. This was clear evidence that NASA must have faked the missionhttp://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23feb_2.htm
.


David Percy said that not one still photograph of John Young matches the video footage, yet NASA claims both were shot at the same time. He indicated that the triangular shaped piece of the fabric was located on the top of John did not appear and NASA said that was a myth. The tip of the fabric can be seen when one closely examine the video ( http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm).


The crosshairs of the astronauts were etched to better help measured objects in the picture. The HBs argue that the film would melt if exposed to a temperature of 250. NASA indicated that Advocates were not aware about the type of film used .Apollo Astronauts used the special transparency film designed specifically. The camera used was protected inside a special case to keep them cool (http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm).


Kaysing argues that when the astronauts were assembling the American flag, the flag waved. That must had been from an errant breeze on the set. A flag would not wave in a vacuum. The advocates were not aware that the flag can wave in vacuum. That happened because when they whipped around the vertical pole, the flag waved since it was attached at the top. The top moved first, and then the cloth followed along in a wave that moved down (http://www.badastronomm.com/bad/mis

I am 92% confidence that no man landed to the money. I agreed with the evidences which were given by Advocates of HBs, for examples shadow cast on the lunar surface should be parallel. Apollo photos were not parallel indicated more than one light source, moisture must be present in soil for it to form footprints, yet the Moon is totally dry world, and a large amount of dust was generated during landings, yet no dust can be seen on the Lunar Module footpads.

REFERENCES

Fox TV and the Apollo Moon Hoax, 13 February 2001, Accessed on 2006- 04-19: 11h10
http://www.badastronomm.com/bad/mis
Did we land on the moon? 15 February 2001, Accessed on 2006- 04-19: 13h30
http://www.braeunig.us/space/hoax.htm

Masiya Kedibone
CSIR Pretoria
0001
Cell No: 073 2519071
Tel No: 012 8412123
Fax: 012 842 3676
E-mail:kmasiya@csir.co.za
Web log: http://kmasiya@csir.co.za.blogspot.com/

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home